The phrase "was at the mercy of" refers to a situation where someone is completely vulnerable, powerless, or dependent on another individual, group, or external force for any outcome or decision. It implies a lack of control, protection, or autonomy, leaving the person subjected to the whims, actions, or decisions of others. When someone or something is "at the mercy of" someone else, they have no choice except to follow along with whatever is imposed upon them.
This expression often conveys a sense of helplessness or subservience, where the individual's fate or well-being is entirely determined by a more dominant or influential party. It suggests that the person in such a position of vulnerability has no ability to influence events, impact decisions, or alter the course of action being taken against them. Being "at the mercy of" implies that one's fate lies solely in the hands of another, leaving the individual susceptible to mistreatment, exploitation, or unfavorable consequences.
For instance, if a country is "at the mercy of" an oppressive dictator, it implies that the citizens have no say in their governance or personal freedoms, and must endure whatever ruling authority imposes upon them. Likewise, if a vulnerable person is "at the mercy of" unethical practices or behavior from others, they are susceptible to harm or exploitation without any ability to resist or defend themselves. In these instances, the phrase emphasizes the concept of complete control or dominance over others, indicating a severe lack of power or agency.
